Kim Kardashian & Reggie Bush Went To Koi Restaurant!
Thursday, July 3rd, 2008 after a late four martini lunch by Jackson
Kim list herself at 120lbs on her official blog.Kourtney doesn't workout too much, but knows working out isn't just to lose weight, it's to maintain a healthy lifestyle. She has been tiny her whole life! In kindergarten she had to get special school uniforms made because she was still in baby sizes! Kourtney is barely five feet tall and weighs 95 pounds! Khloe is looking fabulous too and has cranked up her workouts and changed her diet! She is 5'10" and I don't know how much she weighs! I am about 5'2 1/2" and weigh 120. Source
Read more in Bastardly Breaking News!, Dudes, Kim Kardashian, Sluts & Whores
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Related in a Scandalous way:
- SHOCKING!! Kim Kardashian Went Shopping in Beverly Hills!
- Kim Kardashian Lookin' Bootiful at the Gas Pump! OW!
- Bastardly Breaking News!! Kim Kardashian Hits Up Starbucks!
- Kim Kardashian & Her Sisters Went To Il Sole Restaurant!
- Bastardly Breaking News! Kim Kardashian Superstar spending proceeds from lame sextape at Gucci!
120 lbs for 5'2" is too much. She should lose 10 lbs.
Reply to this Comment
If she shaves the black hairs off her back and ass crack she'll weigh 105.
Reply to this Comment
uh, it depends on how you carry it. 120 at that height isn't bad, but she looks way heavier than. like at least 140.
Reply to this Comment
SOOO GORGEOUS!!!! but ya she was probably 120 lbs before the fame andthe sex tape but definitley not now!!
Reply to this Comment
120 my ass! or actually just her Ass! & he let's her dress him nuff said bout that one.
Reply to this Comment
i heard some dj on the radio put Reggie Reg on blast. she couldn't believe he was from LA being 'how corny' dude is. as for kim, we've got a love/hate relationship. today i love her.
Reply to this Comment
5'2" is very short and 120 lbs is too. My ex girlfriend was 5'1" and 105 lbs and wasn't too skinny, she looked healthy. Kourtney is just 1-2 inches shorter and is 95 lbs and looks great. So yeah, 120 is big unless you are 5'5" +
Reply to this Comment
http://www.weightwatchers.com/health/asm/calc_healthyweight.aspx
scroll down a bit
Reply to this Comment
I don't give a shit about BMI. BMI is absolute bullshit.
The BMI thing will never work because they use the same one for men and women. For example, a 5'7" woman and a 5'7" man should not weigh the same yet a BMI calculator has no way of knowing if you are male or female so they made the BMI thing very general so it can be applicable for both genders.
Besides, Another reason why I know it is bullshit is because there are a ton of hot women who are healthy looking and curvy yet if you put their height and weight in the calculator they would turn out with a BMI under 18.5 and be considered underweight even though they are not.
Another good example is 2 men who are both 6 feet tall and 220 lbs.. The first is a fat ass, the second is a body builder yet both of their BMIs will show up as overweight.
A woman could be exactly 5'6" and 154 lbs and her BMI is considered "healthy/normal". Are you fucking kidding me?? Jessica Alba (pre-baby) is 5'6" and looked to be 115-120 lbs. She was fucking hot back then and had a great body. Now can you imagine Jessica alba gaining 30-40 lbs to go from around 115-120 to 154? She'd be huge but her bmi would be in the normal and healthy weight range.
Kim K is fat and 120 lbs is too much for 5'2". end of story.
Reply to this Comment
I agree with BMI not being the best scale because I’ve seen people whose body fat be over 35% and their weight fall under the correct BMI and likewise I’ve seen athletes with high muscle mass be way over the ‘suggested’ max weight.
Endormorph, Ectomorph, Mesomorph - there are too many body types for one scale like that to follow.
http://www.endomorph.info/
Reply to this Comment
I agree with BMI being BULLSHIT. Girls look their best with a BMI between 17.5 and 18.5.
Reply to this Comment
Actually, Jessica always listed her weight as 128 before she got pregnant but I see your point.
Reply to this Comment
Seriously, who fucking cares how much she weights? She looks amazing in these pics.
Reply to this Comment
so the ass is 120lbs then?
yea...thats believable...so um...
How much does SHE weigh??
Reply to this Comment
**too heavy.
Reply to this Comment
She's bit boned! STress on the "boned" part.
Seriously...Shouldn't be Kim Bush?
Reply to this Comment
meant "big boned"
Reply to this Comment
Damn that MF is lucky! Hit it hard Reggie.
Reply to this Comment
Id hit hard and harder - she has a rockin body and I can care less what the exact weight is. BOYYYY!
Reply to this Comment
Reggie Bush is freakin hot. KK is super pretty but not without all the makeup. I think SHE is the lucky one.
Reply to this Comment
maybe you shouldn't make reggie's fake commentary so stereotypical. it's a little bit offensive.
Reply to this Comment
More ignorant than offensive.
Reply to this Comment
5'2 120 sounds good to me.
Kim is hot.
How can some of you not see it? I don't understand.
Reply to this Comment
Perfect.
For some, this looks hotter:
http://www.moejackson.com/2008-heidi-klum-bikini-pictures-from-mexico-05...
I don't get it.
Reply to this Comment
Kim Kardashian is a fatass and she has a man face.
Heidi Klum is hotter. Heidi's body may not be as hot as it used to be (but her legs are still frickin perfect!!) but she is 35 and has had three kids! I don't even wanna know what Kim K will look like at 35+ after 3 kids....eww!!
you have bad taste.
Reply to this Comment
I guess I do too, cuz Kim is friggin' HOT!!!
Reply to this Comment
Did you click to look at Heidi's pics? Who are you trying to fool? The pictures don't lie, Heidi has the face of a man and the body of an 80 year old woman.
Reply to this Comment
80 year old woman?? What the fuck? What have you been smoking? stop exaggering.
Yes I saw the pictures and clearly she was a bit out of shape in those pictures but she is 35 years old and has 3 children!!! and she still has killer legs and a nice body overall. Did you see the pictures of her from earlier today in that short dress?? She looks amazing.
It's not fair to use a few bad pictures as examples.
Kim is a fatty. Heidi is hot.
Reply to this Comment
Kim's very feminine looking and has an amazing figure. I just can't stand her butt.
Reply to this Comment
90 lbs of that 120 is her fat ass
Reply to this Comment
of course that is assuming she is 120 but this bitch lies about everrrything...she is probably about 135-140 lbs
Reply to this Comment
Yes she is famous for no reason just like all the other "reality" stars but the girl is gorgeous. If she were a legit actress people would LOVE her.
Reply to this Comment
Yeah, she looks about 120 to me, maybe 125. I think she's beautiful; actually, they're a good-looking couple. It's just that she's full of herself and annoying as hell. And what does he do besides stand there and looks serious or play ball? I don't think I've ever heard him speak.
Reply to this Comment
what's with the racist commentary?
Reply to this Comment
then that's the best 120 lbs i've ever seen. she's perfect
Reply to this Comment
She looks gorgeous as usual. Remember, the camera adds about 10 lbs. She's got a small waist; it's just her boobs and butt are big. If this were the 1950's & 1960's, she'd be praised for her figure. Whatever her weight is, she carries it nicely.
She and Reggie make a beautiful couple. I've met him, and he's very soft-spoken and seems bright. Super nice guy.
Reply to this Comment
Black guys have all the luck. Good muscular bodies, and of course that big powerful dick. Damn it sucks to be white sometimes lol.
Reply to this Comment
I bet McPerv would stick his tongue up Kim's filthy ass.
Reply to this Comment
'dey got chicken wings...' what is this racist shite?!
Reply to this Comment
I doubt she only weighs 120lbs, I've seen her in a bikini. More like 140lbs.
There's a reason why the experts don't use the BMI on athletes, bodybuilders, senior citizens and other special cases, because they know these people have higher or lower muscle-fat ratios than is normal. However, the BMI works quite well for the average Joe/Jane. The reason why the healthy weight BMI ranges from 18.5 to 24.9 is related to the existence of different body types. Besides, The BMI is supposed to assess if someone has a healthy weight not if someone looks hot or not. A 5'6'' 154lbs woman might not be hot but she can be perfectly healthy. And the reason why the same BMI is used on both men and women is because men and women have different body compositions. Men are supposed to have more muscle and less body fat than women. I'll expplain this better with an example:
The recommended amount of body fat for men is 8-14% and for women is 20-25%. Let's consider we have a man and a woman both weighing 150lbs (same height).
If the man has 8% of body fat he will have have 12 pounds of adipose tissue and 138 pounds of lean tissue (let's ignore the bones and other parts of the body for the sake of the example).
If the woman has 20% of body fat she will have 30 pounds of adipose tissue and 120 pounds of lean tissue.
Because the man has much more muscle than the woman he will look thinner and leaner whereas the woman will have a more voluminous body and a softer look.
They look different, have different body compositions but their weight is the same and it is healthy for the both of them because it's natural for women to have more body fat than men.
Isn't that what many of you say, that women are supposed to look soft not hard like beef jerky?
Of course, it's way better to have one's body fat percentage checked, it's a far more reliable method of acessing one's health but the BMI works well enough on the majority of individuals. And just because we might think someone like Jessica Alba looks healthy doesn't mean a physician will.
Reply to this Comment
"Isn't that what many of you say, that women are supposed to look soft not hard like beef jerky?"
Yes, this is what Edward Yang says and as everybody knows, that guy knows what he's talking about.
I doubt Kim K. is 140 lbs. If she were that weight, she'd look bigger at 5'2".
Reply to this Comment
And by the way, while the healthy BMI ranges from 18.5-24.9 it's recommended to have a BMI ranging from 20 to 22. Why? Because anything lower or higher than that means one is getting too close to too much or too little weight.
Reply to this Comment
I read that people live the longest when they have a BMI between 22 and 24. There's this huge in-depth study they did (the only subjects though were Caucasian males... ideal BMI is different for different races.)
If this is true, we are idealizing a body type which is less healthy and less than ideal. I say Michelle Ryan's BMI/body type is perfect.
Reply to this Comment
There's an extensive and well-known study that showed people who live on an hypocaloric diet live longer and healthier lives than those who don't. This happens because a hypocaloric diet is effective in reducing chronic inflammation, particularly if coupled with exercise. Of course, one of the consequences of a hypocaloric diet is weight loss and so people on hypocaloric diets will most likely be thin. There are many studies on this matter but the bottom line is that it's been proven time and time again that an individual will be healthier if his or her BMI is lower than 25 (considering the percentage of body fat is also within normal values). There are now more people dying in the world because of too much food than because of too little food (including people starving to death).
I'm aware there are different ideal BMI's for different races. However, it is the same for white and black people. I'm saying this because I know many black people who don't agree with this, but it's the reality of things. Asians on the other hand do have a different ideal BMI. Perhaps this will be surprising to many, but many Asian populations have a higher proportion of body fat compared to Caucasians of the same age, gender and BMI. I must say that the first time I heard about this I thought it made a lot of sense. While Asians do seem thinner than most westerners I had previously noticed Asian girls usually have very chubby legs, even if they are thin. The truth is, more than caucasians, Asians tend to be skinny-fat people (there are really skinny people in Asia as well, of course). That is why the BMI for Asians is:
BMI (kg/m2) for Adults Health Risk
27.5 and above High Risk
23 – 27.4 Moderate Risk
18.5 – 22.9 Low Risk (healthy range)
Below 18.5 Risk of nutritional deficiency diseases and osteoporosis
while for most westerners it is:
BMI (kg/m2) for Adults Health Risk
30 and above High Risk
25 – 29.9 Moderate Risk
18.5 – 24.9 Low Risk (healthy range)
Below 18.5 Risk of nutritional deficiency diseases and osteoporosis
Basically what this means is that a 5'5'', 142 pound caucasian has a healthy BMI/weight and a 5'5'', 142 pound Asian is overweight.
If you're interested you can read more about it here:
http://www.hpb.gov.sg/hpb/default.asp?TEMPORARY_DOCUMENT=1769&TEMPORARY_...
Oh and by the way, I agree with you about Michelle Ryan. She looks great in every possible way.
Reply to this Comment
I don't care how much she weighs. You know why? Because she's a hairy slut and I hate her. If I don't acknowledge her existence, she doesn't exist.
Reply to this Comment
She always looks gorgeous,her face and her body are awesome.Too hot
Reply to this Comment
reggie bush rocks! im his fan of NFL New Orleans Saints fan, coming up in september!!
Reply to this Comment
WHATEVERRRR about the BMI thing.
Kim couldn't be 54kg, i'm 49 and NOWHERE near her weight, yet we are the same height. I bet she's more like 64kg.
Reply to this Comment
dat biatch is soooo not 54kg. She wishes!!
Grossness.
Reply to this Comment
i think kim is beautiful.
being too skinny may look nice in pictures but thats about it.
who wants to hug a skeleton anyways?
be happy with the bodies that you have.... never compare yourselves to those skinny models or actresses you see in magazines, etc. its not realistic or healthy.
Reply to this Comment
120, yea right. Her FAT ASS is at least that heavy! Add in big fat legs, huge tits and her ego... we are up to 220 for sure.
Reply to this Comment
Nah, I would believe 120... maybe 125, possibly 130 at most. I'm the same height as her and weigh 140. I've got more chub than she does, sans the ass. Boobs are about the same size, though.
Reply to this Comment
Please note: Do not use multiple nicknames & leave annoying, pointless comments that only attack other Bastardly Visitors. Also, blatant racial & sexual slurs for no particular reason will not be condoned. BREAK THE RULES: YOU WILL BE BANNED & appeals via email will not be considered. Before you comment, please be aware that no comments will be edited or deleted. Ever.
Lastly, if you have special scoop (i.e. scandalous photos, bastardly ex-girlfriends & boyfriends you want to expose, etc etc), please do contact us directly. You will remain anonymous!