Kim Kardashian @ Rock The Vote Event in L.A.
Friday, September 26th, 2008 in the middle of the damn afternoon by Jackson
Kim Kardashian Hopes 'Dancing' Will Make Her 'Toned'"I really want to be toned. Every girl has her insecurities, whether she is skinny or not. You want to look good when you’re on vacation in a swimsuit," the pin-up reality star told OK! magazine.
But she doesn't want to lose her curves.
"I don’t even think that’s really possible. I’m going to probably have kids soon, so I want to have the perfect body before then. It’ll be harder to get in shape afterward, so why not do it now," she told OK!
"I know that I'm not a stick-skinny girl, and I don't want to be or try to be," she adds. Source

























"I don’t even think that’s really possible. I’m going to probably have kids soon..."
CALL CPS NOW
Reply to this Comment
KIM CELLUITED ASS KARDSHASSIAN ISA BIGGER ATTENTION WHORE WITH FAKE TITS THEN BASTARDLY WRITERS OBSESSION GREASY WITCH CUNT KELLY MONACO
Reply to this Comment
And with all that being said, she's still who she is. My suggestion for you is to find a cause where your opinion will actually matter.
Reply to this Comment
Once she has kids, I don't think she will be a milf. That body will just be busted. She can't even tone up now and she hasn't even had kids yet.
Reply to this Comment
bubba, you are wrong. she's already had four on my kids. ;)
Reply to this Comment
I sure hope she moves her ass better during sex than she does on the dance floor. lol
Reply to this Comment
ORANGE FAKE TAN..... BARF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HORSE FACE CUNT
Reply to this Comment
Uh... like 90% of the women on this site have orange skin lol
Reply to this Comment
Wow shes looks gorgeous. I cant find any flaw with this girl and she kinda reminds me of JLo in the 2nd pic.
Reply to this Comment
TOO MUCH MAKE-UP!!!
Reply to this Comment
She's gorgeous. I'd take her over any supermodel anyday. This looks like a real woman (you can say her ass is fake, breasts, are fake, blah blah blah. You don't have any proof of that, and even if they were fake, she's still hotter than everyone out there).
Reply to this Comment
lol your so sad and jealous because you don't look like a super model.
real women as in women you see everyday, women who are not toned, short, chubby. that's what real women means. duh
Reply to this Comment
lol. You caught me.... I am so jealous of 6 foot tall 90 lb women who only closeted homosexuals find attractive because they remind them of men. Duh, the fashion industry is run by gay men, that's why models are supposed to be super tall and curve-free.
Besides, I'm not hating on tall women because I am 5'8" myself. You're sad for responding to my comment, get a life loser. It sounds like you're the one who can't handle an opinion and somehow got personally offended by my comment. Go cry to your mother you pathetic wimp.
Reply to this Comment
There are many types of supermodels. Many of the models being posted here are commercial models working primarily outside of high fashion. For example, Adriana Lima is considered too meaty by the gay fashion industry, and that's why you rarely see her in high fashion campaigns. She makes almost all of her income from other sources like Victoria's Secret and Maybelline and no longer does runway for high fashion names like Versace, Christian Lacroix, Armani etc. even though she used to when she was younger (and skinnier). She's basically been excluded from the skinny-as-a-rail club, but she makes more money now so who cares.
I think Kim has a very pretty face but she wears too much make-up and I'm not a big fan of short bottom-heavy women, much less a personality type that screams "attention whore". I do think the outfit here suits her though. I'm getting this Indian (as in Native American) vibe which is refreshing.
Oh, and 6 feet is too tall for a woman, I agree.
Reply to this Comment
Adriana Lima is a rare exception, but even so I am not too fond of her body. She may be considered "big" for a supermodel but she is definitely on the skinny side and I'm pretty sure her BMI would be in the underweight range. I don't like her stick thin legs. Pretty face, though.
Take a look at when pictures from fashion shows are posted on here and the models are labeled as sexy..... when they clearly are not.
Reply to this Comment
Adriana has been many different sizes. In 2006 I think her thighs were about the same size as Kardashian's, but she's lost weight and her legs are back to skinny again. In 2007, for the fashion show, her legs were skinny also but she had added a hint of muscle tone
www.casperchristophersen.com/leg2007.jpg
Subtle, not overdone. I like that. Hope she tones up nicely for this year's fashion show as well. My only gripe with Adriana's body (when she's in shape) is her waist-hip ratio. Could be a little better. But then again, her leg-torso ratio is phenomenal and she's always had a nice little curve of a butt which is rare on supermodels nowadays.
Oh, and Petra Nemcova is another example of a commercial supermodel who's not rail thin and who's been posted here on the site a lot. Alessandra Ambrosio is more on the skinny side. Izabel Goulart is even skinnier than Alessandra. And then when you cross over into high fashion, you'll find models who are so thin they look sickly which of course is not sexy at all.
And yea, according to BMI Adriana, in her current shape, would probably be considered "underweight", but that doesn't mean she's not a healthy build.
I quote:
"However, BMI has become controversial because many people, including physicians, have come to rely on its apparent numerical authority for medical diagnosis, but that was never the BMI's purpose... For a fixed body shape and body density, and given height, BMI is proportional to weight. However, for a fixed body shape and body density, and given weight, BMI is inversely proportional to the square of the height. So, if all body dimensions double, and weight scales naturally with the cube of the height, then BMI doubles instead of remaining the same. This results in taller people having a reported BMI that is uncharacteristically high compared to their actual body fat levels. This anomaly is partially offset by the fact that many taller people are not just "scaled up" short people, but tend to have narrower frames in proportion to their height. It has been suggested that instead of squaring the body height (as the BMI does) or cubing the body height (as seems natural), it would be more appropriate to use an exponent of between 2.3 to 2.7."
Reply to this Comment
'Toned'? She'd have to workout and burn about 8500 calories a day to do anything to that huge ass.
Reply to this Comment
Kim, you are perfect just the way you are. We love you. You're so much hotter than that herpes-laden bitch Paris. And to think you two were friends...
Reply to this Comment
Love this bitch.
Reply to this Comment
After birth, she will become a full blown cow.
Reply to this Comment
I wonder what she really looked like without the butt implants? Her face ain't too bad...
Reply to this Comment
Gorgeous and beautiful as always. I love her hair, and her skin is flawless.
The only way she'll tone up on DWTS is if she actually dances. Move your feet, girl! Don't be shy! I want to come back to Team Kardashian.
Reply to this Comment
I gave it to her last week. People seem to forget the show is called DWTStars not DWTDancers. She's learning.
Reply to this Comment
I suppose I'm being too harsh on her. Actually, Kelly Monaco was worse than her and she won the first season. Like she said in the backstage interview, she's just very reserved. Her partner needs to break her of that.
But, I still want either Lance or Brooke to win.
Reply to this Comment
It might work if her partner toned it down a bit, too. He was all over the place on Wednesday... looked like a manic rag doll.
Reply to this Comment
LOL! He makes me dizzy sometimes.
Reply to this Comment
I think the whole point is to see who can handle the rigors and intensity of dance. These folks train on fervent levels and compete fiercely. The producers WANT the drama of seeing if average "stars" (a term used loosely for those whom are on the show and you go; "Who?") can deal with the regimented training these folks eat, sleep, and breathe.
Reply to this Comment
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnd then there is WARREN ZAP.
Reply to this Comment
That dude can move, plus he's adorable. He's on my Top 3 List, right under Lance and Brooke. Kim is #4, so far.
Reply to this Comment
such a fat ass and she can't shake t :(
Reply to this Comment
You people are gotta be fucking blind if you dont find this bitch hot!! Godddd Damnnnnn!
Reply to this Comment
maybe someday she'll get a life and care about something besides herself and her appearance, that would be nice. people who talk about themselves the way she does are boring
Reply to this Comment
shes looks great here, hippie for the win
Reply to this Comment
Love her and her family! She has lost weight, and I hope she wins DWTS!
Reply to this Comment
LOL. You love her family? You love that her father sucked OJs bloody, guilty dick so that his daughter could have the good life, and she turned into a mudshark whore (fucks black guys for money, yes, that's exactly what that tape was don't deny it). Family of lazy cunts, all of 'em. Good to see you admire that -- you MUST be American!
Reply to this Comment
Yeah, she's hot, huh?!?
Reply to this Comment
Mudshark needs to stop dragging that sixty pounds of fried chicken and watermelon in the bag of her pants.
Reply to this Comment
Reply to this Comment
she looks really good
Reply to this Comment
Please note: Do not use multiple nicknames & leave annoying, pointless comments that only attack other Bastardly Visitors. Also, blatant racial & sexual slurs for no particular reason will not be condoned. BREAK THE RULES: YOU WILL BE BANNED & appeals via email will not be considered. Before you comment, please be aware that no comments will be edited or deleted. Ever.
Lastly, if you have special scoop (i.e. scandalous photos, bastardly ex-girlfriends & boyfriends you want to expose, etc etc), please do contact us directly. You will remain anonymous!