Kim Kardashian With Makeup vs Without Makeup

Wow...She actually looks much better without make-up....I'm taken a-back.
I still like her Holly Hunter looking friend better.

Bwahahaaah! Are you sure that's her? Oh this is great shit. :)

Wow, she really should wear a lot less makeup. She looks much better when she's not so overdone.

No make-up is better although I don't find her too attractive anyway, but as Richard-Schlichting said, I'll take that Holly Hunter looking friend anyday.

Same over here Moe, truly hot women don´t even need no make up, I see them everyday, that´s why I´m not impressed by 95% of all hoes in Hollywood.

But I´m totally turned-off by Kim, she really fooled me (I guess it was that ass that got me hooked) but the face looks pretty fucked up. Pass.

As long as she's completely naked, who cares about make up? Add alcohol to the equation, and I'll care even less.

She looks really pretty without makeup but it seems like she's on the rag in the pics

i like her just as much without makeup. shes a natural beauty. i love her eyes.
and of course she is hot as usual

Doesn't even look like the same person. She must spend hours getting herself ready each day.

She is not a bad looking broad, if she tones down the makeup (look for a MTV appearance here somewhere) she actually looks 100% better.

If you compare the Made up vs NON made up pictures, they actually look like 2 different people

She looks ugly with make up on and she doesn't look that bad without make up. I mean she still looks nasty but she doesn't look like a tranny without it.
I still don't like her face. She has bad features.

She looks very pretty here, certainly 1st pic on 4th page.

ugly. the friend however....

A lot of differance I agree, a little make up won't hurt, but I guess she doesn't know how much is enough.

Yup, she looks much better without make-up.

Wait a minute. The hot babe on the left, with the killer rack, is the unknown friend? And the pudgy bitch on the right is the celebrity?!?

That doesn't make any fuckin sense!

wow she looks so much better without makeup i cant believe it. I didnt think she was pretty at all before but now i see she is but rathe rlook like a 2$ whore and hide it

disgusting either way.

whats funny is, i was passsing through TV the other day and the E THS was on...

so between green flag laps in the NASCAR race i watched it...

she denyed ASS implants...but did not deny any of the other work shes "suspected" to have done...

and whats funny is...if you are naive enough to think she HASNT done any work...watch the THS...they have video of her when she was POST puberty....19, 20, 21? she looks like a different person.

whatever shes ugly and disgusting anyways.

WOW! NOT BAD CONSIDERING SHE LOOKS LIKE A TRANSVESTITE WITH MAKE-UP ON. JESSICA SIMPSON HAS THE SAME PROBLEM. PRETTY WITH OUT MAKE-UP N UGLY WITH

she is still wearing make-up...just your everyday, light make up that i wear...and i thought i wore a lot...comparing her so called look without make up to the amount she is wearing on the left...damn...i cant imagine all that shit on my face and feel ok

With or without make-up: still not attractive. Sorry, Kim.

this isnt really a fair comparison...the pic on the right happens to be a really bad photograph....ive seen pics of her without makeup and she looks much, much better not to mention younger.

WoW! with make up on she looks like a man.

Wow, I love women that have natural beauty. Make-up kills everything... sometimes. She actually looks like an ordinary person.

so she must of caked on the make-up in the sex tape too...

without the paint, she looks like a bitch you can fuck...then watch seinfeld with whilst drinking beers and eating doritos...yeah i wine and dine the ladies ;)...

she's got semi-coon eyes without make-up!!!!

The skinny blonde is much hotter. I would prefer her any day.

actually looks quite good without makeup unlike most celebs - not that i class Kim as celeb

anyone got the scoop on the friend?

Kim has the type of beauty I like.
I think she is very pretty (with or without makeup), but as I said before she needs to loose at least 15 pounds.

LOL @ 27

She looks beautiful with and without makeup. She actually looks her age without it, as opposed to looking older with it.

She isalways bangable, but looks better w/o makeup.

She makes my butt itch, but I must say, she is stunning bare-faced, looks much younger and fresher and way more attractive.

She's a 10 with makeup, an 11 without.

Kim's a natural beauty. I was stunned when I saw these because when you look at a girl that wears that much make-up you just assume she is naturally dog ugly. But Kim is absolutely stunning without it. She looks fresh and young and not as much of a slutty bitch. She also looks at least 130% less dirty and likely to infest you with an std.

I'm surprised to say, better without.

the make-up's gonna get smeared anyway, so why the fuck not???

Nice pokies on the friend - Kim can have me with or without make-up. (Call me!)

pics 3, 5, and 7 remind me of the deaf gynecologist - he had to learn to read lips...

make-up no make-up it wouldnt matter if you were bangin her you would be stareing at her massive tits or you would be banging her from behind and staring her massive ass besides after you bang her your gonna put your own special make-up on her face.

She looks great either way, but the surprising thing is how big the difference is.

Without make-up and I know that she's Armenian so it's to be expected, but she actually looks Middle-Eastern, which she is. The above are correct she doesn't need a lot of make-up at all. She should focus on taking care of her skin and so she doesn't need the make-up as much. Still wow.

Other than that Manwhore is right on the money.