This Means War: Film Review

Visit the film's official website!

Chalk it up to another victory for gay marriage.

No, you’re not reading a post at Maddow Blog or The Daily Kos, but after Washington State officially legalized gay marriage this week, it’s kind of hard to not see a theme emerging in the nation’s social zeitgeist (Rick Santorum’s protests notwithstanding).

Case in point: the allegedly heterosexual love triangle at the heart (or substitute any other human organ of choice) of the new Reese Witherspoon movie, This Means War. I say allegedly because though the film is supposed to be about two guys in the CIA (Chris Pine and Tom Hardy) competing for the affections of a seemingly aw-shucks nicey nice girl named Lauren (Witherspoon), the real chemistry in the movie is between Pine and Hardy.

We are told that they despise each other – not only because both want to win over Lauren, but because they also happen to be colleagues who sit literally in front of each other at the CIA and who can’t stop trying to outdo, embarrass, and one-up each other.

And yet there’s so little palpable chemistry between either Pine and Witherspoon or Witherspoon and Hardy that the only relationship you’re really interested in by the time the film is even a quarter of the way through its 97 minute running time is the one between the guys. It’s sort of a modern day i-love-him-but-hate-him bromance with a not so subtle homoerotic subtext. Both men are so in sync with each other that they no only have everything else in common in life but even come up with the same method (creepy stalker surveillance) to try and seduce Lauren. Lauren, for her part, seems perfectly happy burning up her cellular minutes plan chatting with her bestest gal pal Trish (played irreverently by Chelsea Handler). She's really not into the guys, we feel, because they're more preoccupied with each other . . . and not for the reason she's hoping.

This Means War was obviously conceived with two things in mind: one, to further perpetrate the mythology that Reese Witherspoon romantic comedies are good, and two, to make a Valentine’s Day movie that women across the land will force their boyfriends to watch with the misguided assumption that it has anything to do with romance or heterosexuality.

In the end, no one will be more pissed than Rick Santorum. Can’t those Hollywood liberals get anything right?!

Comment on this Scandalous entry »

8 Scandalous Comments

1 Bastard Digs This!
1 HATER ALERT!
843 DIGS vs 409 HATER ALERTS vs 31 DIRTY ALERTS
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend

Do they cross swords?

Thursday, February 16th, 2012 @ 1:40pm
Reply to this Comment
5 Bastards Dig This!
1887 DIGS vs 527 HATER ALERTS vs 113 DIRTY ALERTS
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend

I love me some Tom Hardy but this movie looks dumb. Two guys fighting for Reese Witherspoon? No way.

Thursday, February 16th, 2012 @ 2:09pm
Reply to this Comment
1 Bastard Digs This!
1 HATER ALERT!
7847 DIGS vs 1304 HATER ALERTS vs 377 DIRTY ALERTS
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend

hahaha, so true, Cat.

Monday, February 27th, 2012 @ 11:11am
Reply to this Comment
1 HATER ALERT!
1 Dirty Alert!
8409 DIGS vs 2941 HATER ALERTS vs 167 DIRTY ALERTS
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend

Tom Hardy >

Thursday, February 16th, 2012 @ 10:24pm
Reply to this Comment
1 Bastard Digs This!
1 HATER ALERT!
780 DIGS vs 355 HATER ALERTS vs 16 DIRTY ALERTS
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend

I watched this film and the concept was so far fetched given the casting. Reese Witherspoon wasn't hot enough to have two hot guys fighting over her. They should have cast the lead to Jessica Alba, Megan Fox, or even Kate Hudson. Or they should have cast the two guys to like Vince Vaughn, Pull Rud, Jason Segal or something.

Ridiculous to watch and made me cringe for the two guys playing the roles of desperate, love-struck prince charming's fighting for Reese Witherspoon's attention.

Friday, February 17th, 2012 @ 6:02am
Reply to this Comment
1 Bastard Digs This!
1 HATER ALERT!
705 DIGS vs 171 HATER ALERTS vs 30 DIRTY ALERTS
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend

Seeing this tomorrow. Witherspoon doesn't make sense as the lead woman. I'm only going because of hottie Hardy. :::fanning myself:::

Monday, February 20th, 2012 @ 1:10am
Reply to this Comment
1 Bastard Digs This!
1 HATER ALERT!
705 DIGS vs 171 HATER ALERTS vs 30 DIRTY ALERTS
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend

I enjoyed the movie, a lot. I laughed out loud w/ the audience. Hardy was just...Sooo fucking sexy w/ his accent & those lips! Pine was pretty & gorgeous to look at. Some parts were random but it showed Hardy & Pine can do an action film. Reese I initially thought was a bad choice to have two studs fight over her. But she was quirky, sweet, sexy in that white hot lingerie. Her character fit in the sense that Tuck & FDR (Hardy & Pine) needed someone down to earth like her in their life. From what I saw, everyone left the theater smiling or talking about how good it was.

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012 @ 5:38pm
Reply to this Comment
674 DIGS vs 160 HATER ALERTS vs 14 DIRTY ALERTS
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend

Seeing the racist whore Chelsea Mandler in the trailer was enough to turn most people away.

Saturday, March 10th, 2012 @ 9:54am
Reply to this Comment

Please note: Do not use multiple nicknames & leave annoying, pointless comments that only attack other Bastardly Visitors. Also, blatant racial & sexual slurs for no particular reason will not be condoned. BREAK THE RULES: YOU WILL BE BANNED & appeals via email will not be considered. Before you comment, please be aware that no comments will be edited or deleted. Ever.

Lastly, if you have special scoop (i.e. scandalous photos, bastardly ex-girlfriends & boyfriends you want to expose, etc etc), please do contact us directly. You will remain anonymous!