Miranda Kerr @ G'Day USA Australia Day Black Tie Gala

47 Scandalous Comments

awww she is so cute, she looks like a baby.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 5:30pm
Reply to this Comment

How very average.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 5:32pm
Reply to this Comment

I don't get this one...what is the appeal?

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 5:40pm
Reply to this Comment

How this goofy, pumpkin-headed check ever got hired by Victoria Secret .... I'll never know. She has absolutely NO sex appeal at all.....

And thats the bottom line.................

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 5:44pm
Reply to this Comment

She looks so good on the runway!! why does she look so plain here??!

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 5:45pm
Reply to this Comment

yea, I was never a big fan of this broad. She can look pretty good sometimes but I never found her sexy.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 5:50pm
Reply to this Comment

She is cute, there is nothing terribly wrong with her, but she simply is not a a bombshell, or even a supermodel looking girl to me. I think that VS has a problem that the industry has not done a good job of cultivating sexy, sultry, bombshell type girls. The trend toward generic, interchangeable girls has hurt them. Why do you think they are trying to recycle the older girls (aside from airbrushing), like Evangelista, and Elle, along with using a lot of celebrities, I mean God they have been using Teri Hatcher for high fashion, are you kidding? Kidman is becoming a Stepford wife but they keep running her out there.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 6:03pm
Reply to this Comment

I'm touching myself right now...

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 6:12pm
Reply to this Comment

Victoria's secret isn't about sex appeal. They market their products to women not men. They want a woman to look at their catalog and think that they can wear what VS sells. It's not playboy, the women aren't what makes them their money, it's the clothing.

And I think Miranda Kerr looks great and she's obviously a good enough model to have the dream modeling job or she wouldn't be an Angel. These pictures aren't the best but go look at some of the Adrianna Lima candids on this site.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 6:19pm
Reply to this Comment

she looks weird as hell...her eyes look scary and ugly

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 6:31pm
Reply to this Comment

Eh,

If her backside's as greasy as her forehead - no lube necessary!

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 6:37pm
Reply to this Comment

not looking good here. reminds me of why i initially didn't like her. the cute face doesn't make up for the lack of body... sigh

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 7:08pm
Reply to this Comment

oogly.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 7:11pm
Reply to this Comment

To think they actually allow this freak-show around Ale and Adri. Just disgusting.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 7:18pm
Reply to this Comment

@ 11. Sorry, Victoria's Secret IS ABOUT SEX APPEAL. They may make clothes for women, but men are a target audience too (they look at Victoria's Secret's catalogues much more than women and they also buy stuff for their girlfriends hoping they will look as good as the models while wearing the same lingerie). That tacky show they present every year, for instance...That is for men.

By the way, women also want to look sexy when they buy Victoria's Secret products.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 7:26pm
Reply to this Comment

Hmmm, I was posting while Pstroyer was posting...thanks, I also agree with what you've just said.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 7:28pm
Reply to this Comment

lol pumkin-head..like Lily Cole..

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 7:38pm
Reply to this Comment

that is true pstroyer, but i really love the girly colors like many other women do.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 7:45pm
Reply to this Comment

#11 You are wrong, they are all about sex appeal, they want their models to be sex symbols, they want their models to be a fantasy that women aspire too. Pstroyer is right they have tried to market to a younger demographic, as Hollywood where they moved the show also has, and corporations in general.

However, they differentiate between their teen/twentysomthing lines, Pink, with their sexy brand philosophy of VS in general. There is a reasons that their ratings, and sales have been down, more than other retailers, and part of it is that as a whole their models are not as marketable as they once were. Again, Gisele, Tyra, Stephanie, Heidi (in her prime), Laetitia, they were international icons. Gisele is huge in Asia and the Middle East, they have taken a hit in that whole market, thus trying out new girls.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 8:07pm
Reply to this Comment

Actually, according to their annual report, VS's revenue has been steadily growing and they will continue to expand their business into the new year. It seems the drop has been only in the interest from the youngest demographic (which they are now trying to remedy). Overall, their business is stronger than ever. And viewing figures for the VS fashion show was dropping long before Tyra and Gisele left VS. In fact, 2007 was the first year the fashion show actually increased its viewing numbers in relation to the previous year (and that was without both Tyra and Gisele but admittedly (probably) helped by the Spice Girls).

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 8:20pm
Reply to this Comment

i love her!!! but im more into cuteness than overt sexiness, that shit is so played out, and if it is to be done, please leave it to the brazilians and eastern europeans.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 8:22pm
Reply to this Comment

thanx east euroep is a real treasure chest

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 8:41pm
Reply to this Comment

I think she's usually stunning, but she looks so off here. Everyone has those moment. I can defintely see that Filipina in her. (Yay for the hapas!) She's so baby-cute. I love those wide set ocean eyes.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 8:53pm
Reply to this Comment

There's some Filipina in there too. Don't leave that out. She's Australian of mixed descent. I just remember Filipina and Turkish being thrown in there.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 8:58pm
Reply to this Comment

not looking too great here, but she normally looks sexy as hell

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 10:15pm
Reply to this Comment

Victoria's Secret's sales are flopping because their lingerie quality is going to the shitter. I don't think it as anything to do with the models. Their underwear is becoming cheap and tacky and their new target is mall brats, simple as that.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 10:29pm
Reply to this Comment

See the new VS model. She is AMAZING! One of my favorites already.
I think her name is Emanuela de Paula.

http://goldenfiddle.com/set/390/zoom/10434/large

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 10:40pm
Reply to this Comment

Ok she looks ugly here. I think the only way she looks pretty is with long wavy hair and lots of makeup, otherwise she looks average to ugly.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 10:44pm
Reply to this Comment

yes yes....she'd get the hot malt

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 11:57pm
Reply to this Comment

Yummy yummy yummy!! I'd put some fun in her tummy.

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008 @ 12:35am
Reply to this Comment

Pstroyer, where do you get that? Here is the latest data, their sales are down 8% for 2007 and 14% the last five weeks ending Jan. 5 despite operating 18 additional stores.
www.marketwatch.com/news/story/limited-brands-reports-december-2007/stor...

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008 @ 1:03am
Reply to this Comment

@19
Women buy it bcs they want to look sexy, but a realistic man "doesn't buy stuff for their girlfriends hoping they will look as good as the models while wearing the same lingerie". If a man loves his gf, he buys her sexy stuff to highlight her beauty.
Comparing girlfriend with these chicks is a stupid thing to do. Not because these models are awesome. It just doesn't makes sense. In the catalogs with airbrush and lots of make up, of course models look more beautiful than most of the girls.. But every logical man knows that they are not that perfect.
If a man buys his gf a lingerie just to see if she looks as good as gisele, tyra, lima while wearing the same thing....... Believe me this man has some psychological(complex) problems.
No need to exaggerate these model's beauty. They are just normal women.

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008 @ 6:11am
Reply to this Comment

i love her

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008 @ 9:18am
Reply to this Comment

Yay Miranda! So cute!

She's my #3 fave hottie at the moment after Candice S. and Petra.

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008 @ 9:22am
Reply to this Comment

my new fave VS model just coz she's one of the family...she's part Noypi!

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008 @ 11:49am
Reply to this Comment

i see women with hot bodies all the time, so you are saying only models can look good with victoria secret lingerie, that is not true.

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008 @ 4:35pm
Reply to this Comment

#44
i didn't understand who you responsed to, but a hot woman looks hot even she wears a dress which covers the whole body, for instance a wetsuit (not a wet suit lol)
for VS models, they are just overrated. Look at Miranda. She is cute ok, but that's all.

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008 @ 5:19pm
Reply to this Comment

I want to hug her

Wednesday, January 30th, 2008 @ 11:17am
Reply to this Comment

and for all the haters, she looks a bit like shit on these pic coz her dress is shit, her make up is shit and her hair style is shit. She should fire whoever did this to her lol.

Wednesday, January 30th, 2008 @ 11:21am
Reply to this Comment

i usually think she's cute & pretty but this is...disturbing

Thursday, January 31st, 2008 @ 11:54am
Reply to this Comment

cute

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 5:50pm
Reply to this Comment

Looking rough.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 6:04pm
Reply to this Comment

i love her

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 6:36pm
Reply to this Comment

#11

It's true that VS markets primarily to females (of course) but "sexy" has always been an integral part of their brand. Just look at all their "What is sexy" commercials and their lingerie. However, after it became apparent that VS was losing touch with their youngest consumers, VS started to push a more "youthful" image. VS could have promoted someone like Doutzen Kroes to angel status, but I think they settled on Miranda because she, with her almost childish appeal, was a perfect fit for their new marketing ploy to regain the youngsters. If you compare VS catalogs nowadays to VS catalogs five years ago, there's a noticeable difference. Old VS catalogs were pervaded by a classy, mature and sexy image whereas the catalogs nowadays are filled with girly colors, cute puppies and lollipops. And the models are dressed like freakin bratz dolls. I hope they eventually go back to a more classy and sexy style (admittedly this year's Valentine's campaign and superbowl commercial look to be a good start).

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 7:18pm
Reply to this Comment

yea, I'm sure it's a hit with the youngsters too. And maybe it's improving their sales figures. I just preferred their old style :/

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 7:47pm
Reply to this Comment

Oh yes, and Miranda...

Cute and pretty. Although I don't think these are the greatest shots of her.

Monday, January 28th, 2008 @ 10:30pm
Reply to this Comment

Fire the make-up/hair artist.
she's sooo much prettier than this:((

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008 @ 1:11am
Reply to this Comment

Please note: Do not use multiple nicknames & leave annoying, pointless comments that only attack other Bastardly Visitors. Also, blatant racial & sexual slurs for no particular reason will not be condoned. BREAK THE RULES: YOU WILL BE BANNED & appeals via email will not be considered. Before you comment, please be aware that no comments will be edited or deleted. Ever.

Lastly, if you have special scoop (i.e. scandalous photos, bastardly ex-girlfriends & boyfriends you want to expose, etc etc), please do contact us directly. You will remain anonymous!