Rachel Bilson @ "Jumper" Premiere in Tokyo
Thursday, February 28th, 2008 in the middle of the damn afternoon by Jackson

'Jumper' fails on many levels
Incredibly predictable, I found myself bored watching "Jumper" in theaters. Perhaps if there were different main characters who gave something to the plot, I may have been more intrigued. Sometimes good actors overpower a bad movie.
In this situation, that was not the case. Furthermore, no nudity is shown in this film from either Christensen or Bilson. I believe if there were, both men and women might find their $9.50 well-spent. The other reason viewers might enjoy this film are those sci-fi fans out there. The premise is interesting and hasn't already been attempted in any recent film.
The movie ends with too much of an opening for a sequel. I hope they decide to turn it into a television series and get better actors.
Source

























I'm not digging the bangs on her.
Reply to this Comment
meh
Reply to this Comment
Agree with Foxy. It looks like she is about to twist her ankle on page 2. She should really practice walking in high heels. Hey, she can strut around in her high heels in my bedroom anytime is she likes.
Reply to this Comment
she should fire her stylist for the black heavy thights and shoes with a silk/satine dress. Sucks
Reply to this Comment
.
I like the bangs and lighter hair color.
Though she's always cute, no matter what she does.
.
Reply to this Comment
very pretty with bangs but i agree the movie was horrendous. luckily i get a military discount cause i would've have been mad paying $9.50 to see it too
Reply to this Comment
*would have
Reply to this Comment
Oh, I would never pay to see this movie, because she doesn't have the acting chops to carry a movie. I will watch it on cable just to appreciate her cuteness.
Reply to this Comment
lame
Reply to this Comment
Never has been even cute in my opinion. The bangs make it worse. She also appears to be having some trouble keeping that dress up. It's a cute dress though.
Would look better on someone else, like someone with boobs.
Reply to this Comment
PRETTY!
nothing too special but really pretty! :)
awwwww
Reply to this Comment
the bangs are totally wrong on her. Rachel, WTF?
Reply to this Comment
Rachel changed the hair to get different. But she will go back to the previous look too soon, I believe. But she's cute now as she is in the other way. I agree with Bianca, Rachel Bilson is cute anyway.
By the way, I saw her on a "Chuck" episode yesterday on TV.
Reply to this Comment
This hairstyle isn't giving her the love she deserves. And that movie does suck — I actually laughed out loud during a serious scene. Rachel still fucking rocks, though. Don't think I'm one of these misguided souls who thinks she needs boobs or something.
Reply to this Comment
I hate the way her outfit is put together, but she looks gorgeous. I love her new hair color and her makeup. Oh, and the louboutins of course.
Reply to this Comment
Aww Rach, what's with the bangs?
Hm... despite that still the cutest thing to ever walk the planet.
No one expected that movie to win any oscars, so who cares. At least she's working again.
Reply to this Comment
At first glance I thought this chick was reliving the 50's era...she looks like some chick out of the "Grease" Movie.....She's okay I guess, could use some boobs tho.
Reply to this Comment
I love her style, that dress is so cute. Im not a big fan of her bangs, but she's still adorable.
Reply to this Comment
leela - I agree the outfit is adorable, but it really needs straps to hold it up, since she doesn't have much on top. It's not hot to see a woman keep pulling up her dress because she doesn't have the goods to hold it up.
Reply to this Comment
she can be HOT and not HOT...................but, still BANGABLE!!!!!!!! what's with hair? is that a semi-mullet or what?
Reply to this Comment
Horrible hair, it looks like a wig.
Reply to this Comment
Oh, the hair....everything else is a perfect 10.
Reply to this Comment
She's had better hair days.
Still cute as a baby seal though.
Reply to this Comment
Very cute girl. Very bad hair. Sidenote, Hayden Christensen should never act again.
Reply to this Comment
Doesn't matter if its a naff film if she's in it, i've got my ticket
Reply to this Comment
ah, she dont look as cute as usual :( got jumper today tho, so ill watch that later.
Reply to this Comment
bangs look like shit on her.
Reply to this Comment
She is so cute she even looks good with the bangs - and doesn't that Dress look like it wants to slip off of her Cute Tiny Titties
Reply to this Comment
i think she is very cute and pretty in a kitten, puppies, fuzzy things and sunshine bears sorta way...does that make sense? haha
Reply to this Comment
nice highlights thats about it. she always looks too skinny
Reply to this Comment
jackson ah' jumper'...you watched a movie about a Sweater ?? ;)
Reply to this Comment
Is this girl supposed to be hot?
Please she's run of the mill skank material.
Reply to this Comment
i haven't seen this film but 15% at rotten tomatoes. ah hell no.....
Reply to this Comment
Please note: Do not use multiple nicknames & leave annoying, pointless comments that only attack other Bastardly Visitors. Also, blatant racial & sexual slurs for no particular reason will not be condoned. BREAK THE RULES: YOU WILL BE BANNED & appeals via email will not be considered. Before you comment, please be aware that no comments will be edited or deleted. Ever.
Lastly, if you have special scoop (i.e. scandalous photos, bastardly ex-girlfriends & boyfriends you want to expose, etc etc), please do contact us directly. You will remain anonymous!