Rachel Bilson @ "Jumper" Premiere in Tokyo



'Jumper' fails on many levels



Incredibly predictable, I found myself bored watching "Jumper" in theaters. Perhaps if there were different main characters who gave something to the plot, I may have been more intrigued. Sometimes good actors overpower a bad movie.

In this situation, that was not the case. Furthermore, no nudity is shown in this film from either Christensen or Bilson. I believe if there were, both men and women might find their $9.50 well-spent. The other reason viewers might enjoy this film are those sci-fi fans out there. The premise is interesting and hasn't already been attempted in any recent film.

The movie ends with too much of an opening for a sequel. I hope they decide to turn it into a television series and get better actors.



Source

Comment on this Scandalous entry »

33 Scandalous Comments

I'm not digging the bangs on her.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 9:34am
Reply to this Comment

meh

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 9:42am
Reply to this Comment

Agree with Foxy. It looks like she is about to twist her ankle on page 2. She should really practice walking in high heels. Hey, she can strut around in her high heels in my bedroom anytime is she likes.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 9:52am
Reply to this Comment

she should fire her stylist for the black heavy thights and shoes with a silk/satine dress. Sucks

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 9:56am
Reply to this Comment

.

I like the bangs and lighter hair color.

Though she's always cute, no matter what she does.

.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 10:03am
Reply to this Comment

very pretty with bangs but i agree the movie was horrendous. luckily i get a military discount cause i would've have been mad paying $9.50 to see it too

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 10:14am
Reply to this Comment

*would have

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 10:14am
Reply to this Comment

Oh, I would never pay to see this movie, because she doesn't have the acting chops to carry a movie. I will watch it on cable just to appreciate her cuteness.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 10:20am
Reply to this Comment

lame

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 10:23am
Reply to this Comment

Never has been even cute in my opinion. The bangs make it worse. She also appears to be having some trouble keeping that dress up. It's a cute dress though.
Would look better on someone else, like someone with boobs.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 10:41am
Reply to this Comment

PRETTY!
nothing too special but really pretty! :)
awwwww

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 11:06am
Reply to this Comment

the bangs are totally wrong on her. Rachel, WTF?

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 11:15am
Reply to this Comment

Rachel changed the hair to get different. But she will go back to the previous look too soon, I believe. But she's cute now as she is in the other way. I agree with Bianca, Rachel Bilson is cute anyway.

By the way, I saw her on a "Chuck" episode yesterday on TV.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 11:23am
Reply to this Comment

This hairstyle isn't giving her the love she deserves. And that movie does suck — I actually laughed out loud during a serious scene. Rachel still fucking rocks, though. Don't think I'm one of these misguided souls who thinks she needs boobs or something.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 11:27am
Reply to this Comment

I hate the way her outfit is put together, but she looks gorgeous. I love her new hair color and her makeup. Oh, and the louboutins of course.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 12:09pm
Reply to this Comment

Aww Rach, what's with the bangs?
Hm... despite that still the cutest thing to ever walk the planet.

No one expected that movie to win any oscars, so who cares. At least she's working again.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 12:13pm
Reply to this Comment

At first glance I thought this chick was reliving the 50's era...she looks like some chick out of the "Grease" Movie.....She's okay I guess, could use some boobs tho.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 12:27pm
Reply to this Comment

I love her style, that dress is so cute. Im not a big fan of her bangs, but she's still adorable.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 1:14pm
Reply to this Comment

leela - I agree the outfit is adorable, but it really needs straps to hold it up, since she doesn't have much on top. It's not hot to see a woman keep pulling up her dress because she doesn't have the goods to hold it up.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 1:22pm
Reply to this Comment

she can be HOT and not HOT...................but, still BANGABLE!!!!!!!! what's with hair? is that a semi-mullet or what?

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 1:51pm
Reply to this Comment

Horrible hair, it looks like a wig.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 1:54pm
Reply to this Comment

Oh, the hair....everything else is a perfect 10.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 2:16pm
Reply to this Comment

She's had better hair days.
Still cute as a baby seal though.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 2:46pm
Reply to this Comment

Very cute girl. Very bad hair. Sidenote, Hayden Christensen should never act again.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 3:13pm
Reply to this Comment

Doesn't matter if its a naff film if she's in it, i've got my ticket

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 6:30pm
Reply to this Comment

ah, she dont look as cute as usual :( got jumper today tho, so ill watch that later.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 7:45pm
Reply to this Comment

bangs look like shit on her.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 9:41pm
Reply to this Comment

She is so cute she even looks good with the bangs - and doesn't that Dress look like it wants to slip off of her Cute Tiny Titties

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 10:34pm
Reply to this Comment

i think she is very cute and pretty in a kitten, puppies, fuzzy things and sunshine bears sorta way...does that make sense? haha

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 10:54pm
Reply to this Comment

nice highlights thats about it. she always looks too skinny

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 11:35pm
Reply to this Comment

jackson ah' jumper'...you watched a movie about a Sweater ?? ;)

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 10:45am
Reply to this Comment

Is this girl supposed to be hot?
Please she's run of the mill skank material.

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 10:45am
Reply to this Comment

i haven't seen this film but 15% at rotten tomatoes. ah hell no.....

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 @ 10:46am
Reply to this Comment

Please note: Do not use multiple nicknames & leave annoying, pointless comments that only attack other Bastardly Visitors. Also, blatant racial & sexual slurs for no particular reason will not be condoned. BREAK THE RULES: YOU WILL BE BANNED & appeals via email will not be considered. Before you comment, please be aware that no comments will be edited or deleted. Ever.

Lastly, if you have special scoop (i.e. scandalous photos, bastardly ex-girlfriends & boyfriends you want to expose, etc etc), please do contact us directly. You will remain anonymous!