Guess Who's Hiding Behind Her $3000 LV Handbag?
Tuesday, March 11th, 2008 after a late four martini lunch by Moe
| COMMENT ON THESE HEADLINES FROM THE WEB | |
|---|---|
|
|
Most Popular Categories The Bastardly Feed & Image Host
 The Official Bastardly Image Host Since 2004! Ow! |
RSS FEED | Sexy Tanktop | Bastardly Forum | Bastardly Interviews | Bastardly Travels | Archives | Advertise | Flash Games | Contact | Copyright | About
ALL TRADEMARKS & COPYRIGHTS ON MOEJACKSON.COM ARE OWNED BY THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS.
COMMENTS ARE OWNED BY THE INDIVIDUAL POSTER. 2004-2008 MOEJACKSON IS A BUTTER MEDIA PRODUCTION
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend
I knew it was Lindsay from the leggings. Looks like Stohli. Great Vodka.
Reply to this Comment
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend
i got it right from the fat legs and ugly shoes...but see, it was real tough given how she loves the camera and is hiding from it
Reply to this Comment
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend
"it's not vodka, damn it"
yes it is. now hand it over and nothing else will come of it.
Reply to this Comment
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend
Good old Lindsay.
Reply to this Comment
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend
I'm with d55. I could tell it was LiLo based on the awful shoes.
Reply to this Comment
I can't believe this woman is considered even remotely hot.
Reply to this Comment
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend
At first I thought it was Mischa. Then this fugly drunk freckled turd appeared. Now I wish it HAD been Mischa.
Reply to this Comment
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend
LOL i like how the hiding behind the handbag was obviously a joke and a knock on people like Jessucka Slobba and Biel and people like that who dont WANT to be seen....LOL love the smiles through the rest of the shots.
lilo is awesome.
Reply to this Comment
I didn't want to know, 'cause those hands looked like an old lady's.
Reply to this Comment
GuestbookPrivate MessageMake Friend
What the fuck? First she's "hiding" behind her bag and then she's posing.
Reply to this Comment
THE BAGS NOT $3000...ITS ONLY $700
Reply to this Comment
3,000$ of that bag? oh please, stop overpricing that shit!!! its only 700$ i agree
Reply to this Comment
Please note: Do not use multiple nicknames & leave annoying, pointless comments that only attack other Bastardly Visitors. Also, blatant racial & sexual slurs for no particular reason will not be condoned. BREAK THE RULES: YOU WILL BE BANNED & appeals via email will not be considered. Before you comment, please be aware that no comments will be edited or deleted. Ever.
Lastly, if you have special scoop (i.e. scandalous photos, bastardly ex-girlfriends & boyfriends you want to expose, etc etc), please do contact us directly. You will remain anonymous!