Jennifer Love Hewitt - FHM 100 Sexiest Women 2006 - #43
Monday, April 3rd, 2006 after a late four martini lunch by Jackson

Okay, so I'll be honest...this photoshoot isn't close to the disappointment I've recently had towards Jennifer Love Hewitt.. However, such names that she's ahead of at #43...Brooke Burke, Alessandra Ambrosio, Petra Nemcova, and Gisele Bundchen...I guess the FHM Editors really love Ghost Whisperer.
Vote for your Bastardly Top 10 Sexiest Women!!!

























DUDE!
her thigh looks huge in that picture
she looks like an east german speedskater
Reply to this Comment
Shes only OK. Cool attitude though. Would hit 1ce and sell cell phone pics of her sleeping naked to the tabloids. Come up... by me a viper and a nice condo to attract better looking regular chicks than her. DONT KNOCK THE HUSTLE!
Reply to this Comment
She is looking pretty fucking broke.
Reply to this Comment
She is looking pretty fuckin desperate!!!
She needs to just throw down and do a Penthouse or Hustler “spread�, YES pun intended, She’s to trashy to do Playboy!
Reply to this Comment
Serious Butterface. And damn close to being a butterbody (unless, of course, she decided to shoot for Playboy)
Reply to this Comment
Natural beauty ROCKS!
Reply to this Comment
These pics suck. NEXT!
Reply to this Comment
She's past the point where anyone other than her paid lover would want to see her naked. And even he would probably take a pay cut to see less nakedness from her.
Reply to this Comment
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! The geeks would be all over the pics.
Reply to this Comment
WHAT?? This girl is closer to cold then hot...and she's before all these ladies that should be AT LEAST top 10 material? FHM is screwing around with the list. Her face is just O.K., and she does have sort of big thies and small(almost non-existant) boobs...no really...tell me this is an April Fools joke.
Reply to this Comment
Oh..ok...I didn't explain well.. I mean she has cleavage, but lately it has shrunk or maybe it's just bad photoshoots...but that does not make her hotter, more like the other way around.
Reply to this Comment
bad lighting?
Reply to this Comment
SHE LOOKS TIIIRRED AND SO DO HER TITTIES ... I THINK HER NOSE RESEMBLES A SKI SLOP ... SHUSH
Reply to this Comment
What can I say? I think she has a man-like face, a tired/sad looking face in all these shots, and in general it looks like she has lost her "bloom". Time to get naked and redeem yourself through Playboy Jen!
Reply to this Comment
The second pose is a little out there...I mean, is she playing dead or what?
Reply to this Comment
Maybe the editors dig the "wholesome chick with tits" look and let's at least give her credit for not having a big plastic horrendous rack like so many of her peers. She's not too pretty, IMO, but has good hair (when she's not wearing awful bangs that resemble a cheap wig) and she has shapely legs. On a scale of 1-to-10 I'd say she's a seven...so she doesn't really belong on that list. But she doesn't have huge thighs. Jesus, comments like that make me laugh. Anyone who doesn't have the thighs of a famine victim nowadays is considered huge. In-fucking-sane.
Reply to this Comment
seriously i've never understood this girl's appeal. i remember when my brother told me that not only did he think she was really hot but dudes everywhere did, i thought he was trying to play some big joke on me and take advantage of my gullibleness. i would say she's a butterface but calling her a butterface is an insult to fergie, jessica simpson, and all the other hardworking butterfaces out there who strive day and night to confuse us with their actually hot bodies and ugly faces.
Reply to this Comment
she's gone fat and looks like a sick puppy in these pictures!
Reply to this Comment
Well...we know how I feel about her. But even I am let down by this. Hell...even Keith Olberman looks sexier than she does in this shoot
Reply to this Comment
It's physically impossible for this chick to be sexy.
She's not ugly---she just CANNOT be sexy no matter how hard she tries.
That must really suckl.
Reply to this Comment
Why is the poor girl on the floor.. she look drunk
Reply to this Comment
she's still cute, if you ignore the shithole her career's gone down recently.
Reply to this Comment
she is ok and that innocent look takes her
Reply to this Comment
Why is it that people are so overly critical of female celebrities. I think that women who write bad things have to be fat ugly shallow skanks that have to make themselves feel better by bashing a woman that is better looking and more successful than them. The men are probably the kind of moron who hasn't ever been with anything other than their hand, is fat, ugly, zit faced, out of shape, and sits at home with their computer dreaming about having a real life. Jennifer Love Hewitt is an attractive successful woman, all of the people who write bad things about her really must feel inadequate and unimportant. How about this when you are hailed as an actrative celebrity with lots of money fame and talent, then you can be critical of others. You Jackasses.
Reply to this Comment
RIGHT! POOR AND DESPERATE? She probably has more money than all of you downers!
Reply to this Comment
I agree with you BsH. You haters need to get a life!!
And PageBetty I think its safe to say she deffinately has more everything than these downers, otherwise they wouldnt be hating on her!!!!
Reply to this Comment
These are not flattering photos for sure, but all you people who are putting her down need to check out her Maxim and Rolling Stone photos. Oh, and especially the Levi's jeans commercial she did. She can't be sexy? Ha. Watch that commercial and you'll be eating your words. Yes, they're all a bit older (the first Maxim shoot is from '99)... but all it takes to realize she's still cute is to pull up her last appearance on Leno.
Reply to this Comment
Actually... to all the people out there... who are defending this woman... GET A LIFE... this site is called the BASTARDLY for a reason... you can be nasty about the ugly pictures. They do make her look ugly... not hot... Lets just say she can look better. And she has, she normally looks beautiful.
About her thighs and breasts... her breasts look like they normally do... she isn't wearing any support, and when breasts don' t have support they do sag. And the thighs... Nice thighs, most women have larger thighs because us women have to bear children, also what we eat goes to our thighs too.
Reply to this Comment
I love how trashy and slutty she looks
Reply to this Comment
i'D SELL MY KIDS TO JUST BE ABLE TO SEE HER NAKED ! SHE COULD MAKE ME HARD ENOUGH TO CUT STEEL EVEN WEARING A FEED SACK AND HER HAIR ON FIRE !
DAMN SHE'S BEEN A FUCKING HOTTY EVER SINCE I FIRST SAW HER IN "HOUSE ARREST" ! SHE WAS ABOUT 12-14 THEN AND STILL HAD A NICE RACK !
Reply to this Comment
In #2 she looks exhausted and #3 she looks like Cher! She looks old and used up in all them. They had the right idea in bottom pic of series #1 on here. Kick the has been to the curb!!!
Reply to this Comment
Please note: Do not use multiple nicknames & leave annoying, pointless comments that only attack other Bastardly Visitors. Also, blatant racial & sexual slurs for no particular reason will not be condoned. BREAK THE RULES: YOU WILL BE BANNED & appeals via email will not be considered. Before you comment, please be aware that no comments will be edited or deleted. Ever.
Lastly, if you have special scoop (i.e. scandalous photos, bastardly ex-girlfriends & boyfriends you want to expose, etc etc), please do contact us directly. You will remain anonymous!